Blackman

United States v. Blackman

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 5, 202423-1885California676 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 5 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1885 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:22-cr-00048-BMM-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

WILLIAM RONALD BLACKMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Brian M. Morris, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 19, 2024** Portland, Oregon

Before: CHRISTEN and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, District Judge.***

Defendant William Blackman argues that the district court erred by

deferring its ruling on his motion for acquittal and that he received ineffective

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David A. Ezra, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. assistance of counsel during trial. Because the parties are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.