Tavares

Tavares v. Ball CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 2024E081050California357 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/6/24 Tavares v. Ball CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

DESERET TAVARES,

Plaintiff and Respondent, E081050

v. (Super.Ct.No. CVPS2102396)

MARILYN LOUISE BALL, OPINION

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Manuel Bustamante,

Judge. Affirmed.

Marilyn Louise Ball, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

Buchalter, Robert Collings Little, and Michael J. Worth for Plaintiff and

Respondent.

1 Defendant Marilyn Ball appeals from a default judgment awarding plaintiff

Deseret Tavares $41,982.47 in damages, costs, and prejudgment interest. Ball argues that

the trial court abused…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.