Kate Adams v. County of Sacramento
116 F.4th 1004
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 9, 202423-15970California9,741 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KATE ADAMS, No. 23-15970
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01499- v. WBS-KJN
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO;
SCOTT JONES, Sheriff, OPINION
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted May 16, 2024 San Francisco, California
Filed September 9, 2024
Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Sidney R. Thomas; Dissent by Judge Consuelo M. Callahan SUMMARY *
First Amendment / Employment Retaliation
In an interlocutory appeal, the panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of First Amendment retaliation and derivative conspiracy claims brought by Kate Adams, the former Chief of Police for the City of Rancho Cordova, alleging that she was forced to resign from her post over allegations that while working for the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office she sent racist text messages. In evaluating the First…