Jesus Pimentel v. City of Los Angeles
Opinion
Opinion
LEE, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JESUS PIMENTEL; DAVID R. No. 22-55946 WELCH; JEFFREY O'CONNELL; EDWARD LEE; WENDY COOPER; D.C. No. JACKLYN BAIRD; RAFAEL 2:14-cv-01371- BUELNA, and all persons similarly FMO-E situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION
and
ANTHONY RODRIGUEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES,
Defendant-Appellee,
v.
ELEN KARAPETYAN,
Movant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Fernando M. Olguin, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted January 25, 2024 Pasadena, California
Filed September 9, 2024
Before: Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Mark J. Bennett, and Kenneth K. Lee, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Lee; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Bennett
SUMMARY *
Excessive Fines Clause
The panel reversed the district court’s summary judgment for the City of Los Angeles in a class action alleging that the City of Los Angeles’ $63 penalty for failure to timely pay a fine for a parking meter violation, which is set at 100 percent of the $63 parking fine, violates the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive…