People v. Hanif CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 2024C098811California1,248 words

Opinion

Opinion

Eurie, J.

Filed 9/9/24 P. v. Hanif CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado) ----

THE PEOPLE, C098811

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. S21CRF0107,

S20CRF0061)

v.

RAHEEM AHMED HANIF,

Defendant and Appellant.

Appointed counsel for defendant Raheem Ahmed Hanif asked this court to review the record and determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We will affirm the judgment and order the trial court to issue an amended abstract of judgment that reflects the judgment as imposed by the trial court.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In May 2020, a police officer found Hanif and a group of five or six people standing around a picnic table in a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.