People v. Arocha CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 2024B332948California627 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/9/24 P. v. Arocha CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE, B332948

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. A989460) v.

RUDY AROCHA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ray G. Jurado, Judge. Dismissed. Verna Wefald, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent. In 1989, defendant and appellant Rudy Arocha (defendant) was convicted by guilty plea of second degree murder and robbery. During the plea colloquy, defendant (and his attorney) accepted this statement by the prosecutor as the factual basis for defendant’s plea: “It is our understanding in this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.