Flowers
Flowers v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 10, 202423-3744California964 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 10 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HILDEBRANDT FLOWERS, No. 23-3744 Agency No. Petitioner, A091-700-015 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 16, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: TASHIMA, CALLAHAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Hildebrandt Flowers, a native and citizen of Belize, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”).
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 and deny the petition.