People v. Casillas CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 10, 2024A169929California2,118 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 9/10/24 P. v. Casillas CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A169929

v. SALVADOR CASILLAS, JR. (Solano County Super. Ct. No. FCR345030) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Salvador Casillas appeals from a trial court order ordering him to pay an additional $2,375 in restitution to the California Victims Compensation Board. Casillas’s appellate counsel filed a brief asking this court to independently review the record for arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Casillas was informed of his right to file supplemental briefing and has not done so. Finding no errors or other issues requiring further briefing, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

As we stated in our…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.