Kristen Silloway v. City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
117 F.4th 1070
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 202422-16079California14,130 words

Opinion

Opinion

HAMILTON, J.

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KRISTEN SILLOWAY; CHRISTA No. 22-16079

DURAN; BRIGITTA VAN EWIJK,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 3:20-cv-07400-RS

v.

OPINION

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO,

Defendant-Appellee.

TATYANA LITVINOVA, No. 22-16568 individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01494-RS Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN

FRANCISCO,

Defendant-Appellee. SILLOWAY V. CITY & CNTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Richard Seeborg, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2024 San Francisco, California

Filed September 11, 2024

Before: Carlos T. Bea, David F. Hamilton,* and Morgan Christen, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Hamilton; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge Bea

SUMMARY**

Fair Labor Standards Act

The panel reversed the district court’s summary judgment for the City and County of San Francisco, and remanded, in two cases in which staff nurses employed by the City allege…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.