Wendy Luft v. Martin O'Malley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 202423-35613California1,047 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 11 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WENDY ANN LUFT, No. 23-35613

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:22-cv-00515-HZ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernandez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 9, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BEA and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and M. FITZGERALD,*** District Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Wendy Ann Luft appeals the district court’s order

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael W. Fitzgerald, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. affirming a decision by an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) denying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.