United States v. Felipe Gonzalez-Alvarez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 202422-50049California567 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 11 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50049

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:21-cr-02163-LAB-1 v.

FELIPE GONZALEZ-ALVAREZ, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-50050

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:11-cr-03677-LAB-1 v.

FELIPE GONZALEZ-ALVAREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 9, 2024** Pasadena, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: IKUTA, FRIEDLAND, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Felipe Gonzalez-Alvarez appeals his sentence of 80 months for unlawful

reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.