Rhawn Joseph v. City of San Jose
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
SEP 11 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RHAWN JOSEPH, No. 23-15358
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-01294-RMI v.
CITY OF SAN JOSE, a Municipal MEMORANDUM* corporation; et al.,
and
DAVE SYKES; et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Robert M. Illman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 11, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
Rhawn Joseph appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in
favor of Defendants-Appellees in his action bringing federal and state law claims
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). arising from the enforcement efforts of the City of San Jose (“City”) requiring