Rhawn Joseph v. City of San Jose

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 11, 202423-15358California2,547 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

SEP 11 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RHAWN JOSEPH, No. 23-15358

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-01294-RMI v.

CITY OF SAN JOSE, a Municipal MEMORANDUM* corporation; et al.,

and

DAVE SYKES; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Robert M. Illman, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 11, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: WALLACE, O’SCANNLAIN, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Rhawn Joseph appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in

favor of Defendants-Appellees in his action bringing federal and state law claims

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). arising from the enforcement efforts of the City of San Jose (“City”) requiring

Joseph to remove structures, lower…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.