Brown

Brown v. Kingan CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 11, 2024G062611California4,237 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/11/24 Brown v. Kingan CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ROBERT A. BROWN et al.,

Plaintiff and Appellants, G062611

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2020- 01173623) REIKO KINGAN et al.,

OPINION

Defendants and Respondents.

Appeals from a judgment and order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Sheila Recio, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. Law Offices of Robert A. Brown and Robert A. Brown, in pro. per., and for Plaintiff and Appellant Kurt Hughes. Webb Law Group, Lenden F. Webb and Katherine E. Cervantes for Defendants and Respondents. Plaintiff Kurt Hughes filed a complaint against defendants Reiko Kingan and Charles Kingan (collectively, Kingan defendants), among…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.