Daniel Lazcano v. Ron Haynes

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 202422-35315California557 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL LAZCANO, No. 22-35315

Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-00351-RMP

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RON HAYNES,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Rosanna Malouf Peterson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 9, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: W. FLETCHER and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,*** District Judge.

Daniel Lazcano appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas

relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We review the district court’s denial of the habeas

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. petition de novo. Leeds v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.