Banq, Inc. v. Scott Purcell

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 202423-15229California970 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BANQ, INC., a Florida corporation, No. 23-15229

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-00773-APG-VCF v.

SCOTT PURCELL; GEORGE MEMORANDUM*

GEORGIADES; KEVIN LEHTINIITTY;

ELEMENTAL FINANCIAL

TECHNOLOGIES, INC., FDBA Fortress Block Chain Technologies, Inc., FDBA Fortress NFT Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation; FORTRESS NFT, INC., FDBA Planet NFT, Inc., a Delaware corporation,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Appellant Banq, Inc., appeals the district court’s decision…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.