Romero-Corona

United States v. Romero-Corona

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 202423-1520California1,021 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1520 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:22-cr-01886-BAS-1 v. MEMORANDUM*

ISIDRO ROMERO-CORONA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cynthia A. Bashant, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and HSU, District Judge.***

Isidro Romero-Corona appeals his conviction and sentence for attempted

unlawful reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Wesley L. Hsu, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.