Ramirez Rebollar v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 202423-56California717 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 12 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ESMERALDA RAMIREZ REBOLLAR, No. 23-56 A.J.S.R., K.Y.S.R., and V.J.S.R., Agency Nos. Petitioners, A215-818-231
A215-818-232
v. A213-818-233
A215-818-234
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 9, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: GOULD and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SEABRIGHT,*** District Judge.
Petitioners Esmeralda Ramirez Rebollar and her minor children (A.J.S.R.,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable J. Michael Seabright, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. K.Y.S.R., and…