Ramirez Rebollar v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 202423-56California717 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ESMERALDA RAMIREZ REBOLLAR, No. 23-56 A.J.S.R., K.Y.S.R., and V.J.S.R., Agency Nos. Petitioners, A215-818-231

A215-818-232

v. A213-818-233

A215-818-234

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 9, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and SEABRIGHT,*** District Judge.

Petitioners Esmeralda Ramirez Rebollar and her minor children (A.J.S.R.,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable J. Michael Seabright, United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. K.Y.S.R., and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.