Meyer

United States v. Meyer

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 12, 202423-2567California613 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 12 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2567 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 9:22-cr-00060-DLC-1 v. MEMORANDUM*

DANIEL AUGUST MEYER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: GRABER and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.***

Daniel August Meyer timely appeals the sentence imposed following his

guilty plea to one count of stalking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2261A(2)(B). We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.