League of California Cities v. FCC
118 F.4th 995
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 202420-71765California23,505 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES; No. 20-71765
LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES;
CITY OF GLENDORA, FCC No.
CALIFORNIA; CITY OF RANCHO 19-250
PALOS VERDES; CITY OF
TORRANCE, CALIFORNIA,
OPINION
Petitioners,
CITY OF COCONUT CREEK,
FLORIDA; CITY OF THOUSAND
OAKS, CALIFORNIA; NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
OFFICERS AND ADVISORS;
TOWN OF BRECKENRIDGE,
COLORADO,
Intervenors,
v.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION; UNITED STATES
OF AMERICA, Respondents,
CTIA - THE WIRELESS
ASSOCIATION; THE WIRELESS
INFRASTRUCTURE
ASSOCIATION,
Intervenors.
CITY OF SEATTLE WASHINGTON; No. 20-72734
CITY OF BEAVERTON, OREGON;
CITY OF CARLSBAD, California; FCC No. CITY OF CERRITOS, California; FCC-20-75 CITY OF CONCORD, California; CITY OF CORONADO, California; CITY OF ENCINITAS, California; CITY OF HERMISTON, California; CITY OF NAPA, California; CITY OF PLEASANTON, California; CITY OF
RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA; CITY
OF SAN MARCOS, California; CITY OF SAN RAMON, California; CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, California; CITY OF SOLANA BEACH,…