United States v. Williams

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 202423-1365California527 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1365 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:20-cr-00176-SVW-4 v.

MEMORANDUM*

BRANDON CHRISTOPHER

WILLIAMS, AKA Tricky,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 11, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: R. NELSON, MILLER, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.

Brandon Williams appeals his 188-month sentence for one count of

conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine. He argues that the appellate waiver in

his plea agreement does not bar his appeal. He also argues that the district court

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). committed procedural error by failing to adequately address the 18 U.S.C §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.