Patel

Patel v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 202423-1904California773 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MITHIL PATEL, No. 23-1904 Agency No. Petitioner, A241-880-573 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 11, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and M. FITZGERALD, District Judge.***

Mithil Patel, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of a decision

by the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (IJ)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael W. Fitzgerald, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. denial of his requested continuance. We have jurisdiction under 8…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.