Kapila

Kapila v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 202423-3333California715 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANKUSH KAPILA, No. 23-3333 Agency No. Petitioner, A061-396-174 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 11, 2024** San Francisco, California Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Ankush Kapila, a native and citizen of India, seeks review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)

denial of his application for deferral of removal under the regulations implementing

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. “We review questions of law regarding CAT claims de novo.” Park…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.