Catherine Sigley v. Dexcom, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 202423-55775California922 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 13 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CATHERINE SIGLEY, an individual, No. 23-55775
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01877-JO-MMP v.
DEXCOM, INC., MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Jinsook Ohta, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 11, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: IKUTA, FRIEDLAND, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Dexcom, Inc., appeals from a district court order remanding Catherine
Sigley’s suit against Dexcom to California state court. The district court remanded
the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), explaining that removal was improper under
the forum defendant rule because Dexcom is a California citizen. See 28 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). §…