Catherine Sigley v. Dexcom, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 202423-55775California922 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CATHERINE SIGLEY, an individual, No. 23-55775

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-01877-JO-MMP v.

DEXCOM, INC., MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Jinsook Ohta, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 11, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, FRIEDLAND, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Dexcom, Inc., appeals from a district court order remanding Catherine

Sigley’s suit against Dexcom to California state court. The district court remanded

the case under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), explaining that removal was improper under

the forum defendant rule because Dexcom is a California citizen. See 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.