Aguiriano-Flores

Aguiriano-Flores v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 202423-3394California611 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCOS AURELIO AGUIRIANO- No. 23-3394 FLORES; IKER LICHTSTEINER Agency Nos.

AGUIRIANO-SARMIENTO; YOLIBETH A220-453-258

STEFANNY SARMIENTO- A220-453-259

ALCANTARA,

A220-314-022

Petitioners,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 11, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Marcos Aurelio Aguiriano-Flores, a native and citizen of Honduras, his wife,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and his son petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision

affirming the order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.