Wise

United States v. Wise

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 13, 202424-383California913 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 13 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 22-16165, 24-383

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:12-cr-00111-EMC-1 v. 3:12-cr-00642-EMC-

WILLIAM J. WISE,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 9, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BEA and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges, and M. FITZGERALD,*** District Judge.

Defendant-Appellant William J. Wise appeals the district court’s orders:

(1) denying his motion to amend his motion to vacate or set aside his conviction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Michael W. Fitzgerald, United States District Judge for the Central…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.