Kramer

Kramer v. Coinbase CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 2024A167779California5,432 words

Opinion

Opinion

Petrou, J.

Filed 9/12/24 Kramer v. Coinbase CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

DARREN KRAMER, et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,

A167779

v. COINBASE, INC., et al., (San Francisco City & County Super. Ct. No. CGC-23-604357) Defendants and Appellants.

Plaintiffs Darren Kramer, Manish Aggarwal, Mostafa El Bermawy, and Amish Shah filed a complaint against Defendant Coinbase, Inc. (Coinbase) for public injunctive relief under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.; CLRA), the California False Advertising Law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17500, et seq.; FAL), and the California Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200, et seq.; UCL). The trial court denied Coinbase’s motion to compel arbitration on the basis that plaintiffs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.