Arturo Verdin v. Bryan Phillips
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ARTURO ROSALES VERDIN, No. 22-55335
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-06821-JLS-SP v.
BRYAN D. PHILLIPS, MEMORANDUM*
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court For the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 11, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: IKUTA, FRIEDLAND, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Arturo Rosales Verdin appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 habeas petition challenging his state first-degree and attempted murder
convictions. Verdin argues that the California state court erred in admitting
statements he made during an August 2007 interrogation because he had invoked his
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P.…