People v. Kiss CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 2024B332487California1,290 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/16/24 P. v. Kiss CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B332487 (Super. Ct. No. 21F-07332) Plaintiff and Appellant, (San Luis Obispo County)

v.

MICHAEL JOSEPH KISS,

Defendant and Respondent.

Michael Joseph Kiss appeals an order of restitution to the victims of his criminal offense of driving while intoxicated. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by ordering Kiss to pay $18,000 for past medical expenses to the child victim and affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY1

In the morning of October 10, 2021, Tamara Ardron walked her children to school. She paused at a crosswalk and activated

This factual summary is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.