Hendricks

United States v. Hendricks

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 202423-2240California673 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2240 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cr-00175-TOR-1 v. MEMORANDUM*

MATTHEW DYLAN HENDRICKS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Thomas O. Rice, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 12, 2024** Seattle, Washington

Before: CHRISTEN and SUNG, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.***

Matthew Dylan Hendricks appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. suppress evidence.1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.