Alvarado Silva v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 16, 202423-1111California529 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 16 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARMINDA ALVARADO SILVA; JORGE No. 23-1111 ALBERTO LEAL ALVARADO, Agency Nos.

A209-801-174

Petitioners, A209-801-175 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 12, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Arminda Alvarado Silva and her minor son, natives and citizens of Mexico,

petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision affirming

the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The BIA

affirmed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.