Jana Smith v. Jill Limerick

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202423-35476California1,494 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JANA A. SMITH, No. 23-35476

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:17-cv-00712-AA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JILL LIMERICK,

Defendant-Appellee,

JAMES SANSONE,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

BARBARA WILT,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 23, 2024** Portland, Oregon

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: WALLACH,*** CHRISTEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Jana Smith appeals the dismissal of her action alleging state-law claims

against Jill Limerick, Barbara Wilt, and James Sansone (Defendants). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

1. The district court did not abuse its discretion by taking judicial notice

of public…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.