Extreme Transportation v. Salazar CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 2024D083027California4,963 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/17/24 Extreme Transportation v. Salazar CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

EXTREME TRANSPORTATION, INC., D083027

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2019- 00059072-CU-BC-CTL)

JONATHAN SALAZAR

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Ronald F. Frazier, Judge. The appeal is construed as a petition for writ of mandate and denied; motion to dismiss is denied as moot. Webb Law Group and Lenden F. Webb for Defendant and Appellant. Landay Roberts, John K. Landay, and Waddy Stephenson for Plaintiff and Respondent.

In 2021, Jonathan Salazar successfully moved to set aside a default judgment entered against him and in favor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.