Zielke

Leep, Inc. v. Zielke

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202423-2661California897 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEEP, INC., No. 23-2661 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 6:20-cv-01673-MC v.

MEMORANDUM*

LAURENCE ZIELKE, an individual; ZIELKE LAW FIRM, PLLC,**

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2024*** San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE, BEA, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant LEEP, Inc. (“LEEP”) appeals an order of the U.S. District

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** Defendants-Appellees John Nordstrom, Americap Co., Inc., Americap Two, and Americap Three were not parties to this appeal. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Court for the District of Oregon that denied LEEP’s motion to alter or amend the

district court’s December 2022…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.