Hamid

Hamid v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202423-1179California490 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHAUDHRI ABDUL HAMID, No. 23-1179 Agency No. Petitioner, A091-209-769 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 12, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Chaudhri Abdul Hamid, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order affirming the Immigration

Judge’s (IJ) denial of cancellation of removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a), and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3). Petitioner did not administratively

appeal the IJ’s denial of his applications for asylum or for protection under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.