Hamid
Hamid v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202423-1179California490 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHAUDHRI ABDUL HAMID, No. 23-1179 Agency No. Petitioner, A091-209-769 v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 12, 2024** Pasadena, California
Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Chaudhri Abdul Hamid, a native and citizen of Pakistan, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) order affirming the Immigration
Judge’s (IJ) denial of cancellation of removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a), and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). withholding of removal, 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3). Petitioner did not administratively
appeal the IJ’s denial of his applications for asylum or for protection under…