Kimberly Davis v. USA

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 18, 202423-55701California342 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

SEP 18 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KIMBERLY DAVIS; EBONY No. 23-55701

CHAPPELL,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:23-cv-02911-RGK-MAA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE;

KAILONI ANGELIQUE BROWN,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 18, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Kimberly Davis and Ebony Chappell (Plaintiffs) appeal from the district

court’s dismissal for lack of prosecution of their tort action against the United

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). States, the United States Postal Service, and Kailoni Angelique Brown

(Defendants). Reviewing for an abuse of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.