Kimberly Davis v. USA
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 18, 202423-55701California342 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
SEP 18 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KIMBERLY DAVIS; EBONY No. 23-55701
CHAPPELL,
D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:23-cv-02911-RGK-MAA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE;
KAILONI ANGELIQUE BROWN,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 18, 2024** San Francisco, California
Before: O’SCANNLAIN, FERNANDEZ, and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.
Kimberly Davis and Ebony Chappell (Plaintiffs) appeal from the district
court’s dismissal for lack of prosecution of their tort action against the United
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). States, the United States Postal Service, and Kailoni Angelique Brown
(Defendants). Reviewing for an abuse of…