Lashinsky

Lashinsky v. Law Offices of Catharine Kroger-Diamond CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 2024D083058California8,214 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/18/24 Lashinsky v. Law Offices of Catharine Kroger-Diamond CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ASHLYN LASHINSKY, D083058

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2022-00003856-CU-PN-NC)

LAW OFFICES OF CATHARINE

KROGER-DIAMOND et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Earl H. Maas, III, Judge. Affirmed. Law Office of David W. Allor, David W. Allor and Birgit Dominguez for Plaintiff and Appellant. Wingert Grebing Brubaker & Juskie, Charles R. Grebing and Pragya Sharma for Defendants and Respondents. Plaintiff and appellant Ashlyn Lashinsky appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants and respondents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.