People v. Sigmund CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 2024H051837California1,498 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/18/24 P. v. Sigmund CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H051837

(Santa Cruz County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. Nos. F19709, F20357)

v.

PETER SIGMUND,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT1

Peter Sigmund challenges an order denying his motion to modify sentence and to vacate the court-ordered restitution fines pursuant to Assembly Bill No. 1869 and Penal Code section 1465.9.2 For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the order.

I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND3

In 2011, the Santa Cruz County Superior Court convicted Sigmund by plea in two separate actions. In case number F19709, he was convicted of six counts of lewd acts with a child (§ 288, subd. (a), counts 1-6, 8, 10-11), two counts of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.