Vargas Lainez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 18, 202423-3432California779 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 18 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KELIN VARGAS LAINEZ; KEVIN No. 23-3432 VARGAS MARTEL, Agency Nos.

A220-940-616

Petitioners, A220-940-617 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and COLLINS, District Judge.***

Kelin Vargas Lainez and Kevin Vargas Matel (“Petitioners”), natives and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. citizens of Honduras, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) dismissal of their appeal of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.