Aguirre Gonzalez v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 19, 202422-1633California412 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 19 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE RUBEN AGUIRRE GONZALEZ, No. 22-1633 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-536-223 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 12, 2024** Pasadena, California

Before: SCHROEDER, R. NELSON, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Ruben Aguirre Gonzalez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision affirming an immigration

judge’s order of removal and denial of his motion for a continuance related to his

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). application for adjustment of status. We dismiss the petition.

Aguirre Gonzalez requested a continuance so that he could reconcile with

his wife, a U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.