Malik
United States v. Malik
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2024
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2016 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cr-00321-MCS-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
KEITH SHAZAD MALIK, AKA
keithshazadmalik@gmail.com, AKA keithmalik@gmail.com,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Mark C. Scarsi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 17, 2024**
Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Keith Shazad Malik appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
transmitting interstate threats in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c). We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.