Malik

United States v. Malik

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202423-2016California531 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-2016 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:22-cr-00321-MCS-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

KEITH SHAZAD MALIK, AKA

keithshazadmalik@gmail.com, AKA keithmalik@gmail.com,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Mark C. Scarsi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024**

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Keith Shazad Malik appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 60-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

transmitting interstate threats in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c). We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Malik first argues…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.