Jones

United States v. Jones

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202423-1932California312 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1929 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:21-cr-00019-JCC-6 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MONIQUE JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-1932 23-1929 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:21-cr-00019-JCC-7 1:21-cr-00019-JCC-6 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MEKAYDA D. JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Appeal from the District Court of Guam John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 17, 2024**

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Monique and Mekayda D. Jones appeal from

the forfeiture order and in personam money judgments imposed pursuant to

U.S.C. §§ 981(a)(1)(C) and 982(a)(2)(A) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c), upon

appellants’ jury-trial convictions for wire fraud, conspiracy to commit wire fraud,

and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.