Myrna De Jesus v. Dignity Health

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202423-15189California1,005 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2024

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

MYRNA DE JESUS, No. 23-15189 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00926-DWL v.

DIGNITY HEALTH CORPORATION, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Dominic Lanza, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 20, 2024**

Before: BENNETT, BADE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Myrna De Jesus, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s

summary judgment against her in her defamation lawsuit against Defendant

Dignity Health Corporation (“Dignity Health”). De Jesus performed work at St.

Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center (“St. Joseph’s”), although her actual

employer was a third-party vendor, Optum360 Services, Inc. (“Optum”). De Jesus

was terminated by Optum after Dignity Health personnel told her Optum

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. **…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.