Roxanne R. v. Superior Court CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 20, 2024A170877California10,225 words

Opinion

Opinion

Miller, J.

Filed 9/20/24 Roxanne R. v. Superior Court CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ROXANNE R.,

Petitioner, v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF A170877

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY,

(San Francisco County Respondent; Super. Ct. No. JD223184)

SAN FRANCISCO HUMAN

SERVICES AGENCY,

Real Party in Interest.

Roxanne R. (Mother) petitions this court for extraordinary relief from dependency court orders terminating her reunification services after an 18- month review hearing and setting a hearing under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 to select a permanent plan for her three-year-old daughter D.B. (Minor).1 Mother argues that the juvenile court applied the wrong legal standard in determining that Minor could not be returned to her care, and that substantial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.