Jeronimo-Barron

Jeronimo-Barron v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202424-1279California414 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUBEN JERONIMO-BARRON, No. 24-1279 Agency No. Petitioner, A220-489-871 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 17, 2024**

Before: WARDLAW, BADE, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Ruben Jeronimo-Barron, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ’s”) decision denying his application for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

de novo questions of law and constitutional claims. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400

F.3d 785, 791-92…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.