In Re: Dane S. Field v. Bank of America, N.A.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202422-16291California483 words

Opinion

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SEP 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

In re: ROLANDO MANGSAT TIRSO; No. 22-16291

KAMEHALYN SANTOS TIRSO,

D.C. No. Debtors. 1:22-cv-00075-JMS-WRP ______________________________ District of Hawai‘i, Honolulu DANE S. FIELD, Chapter 7 Trustee,

ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BANK OF AMERICA, NA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Before: CALLAHAN and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

The panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing

(Dkt. 45). The petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The memorandum

disposition filed on July 17, 2024, is hereby amended. The amended disposition

will be filed concurrently with this order.

No further petitions for rehearing may be filed.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: ROLANDO MANGSAT TIRSO; No. 22-16291

KAMEHALYN SANTOS TIRSO,

D.C. No. Debtors. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.