Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association v. City of San Jose

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202423-16091California954 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HOWARD JARVIS TAXPAYERS No. 23-16091

ASSOCIATION; SILICON VALLEY

TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION; SILICON D.C. No. 5:22-cv-00501-BLF

VALLEY PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY

FOUNDATION; JAMES BARRY;

GEORGE ARRINGTON, MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

CITY OF SAN JOSE, a public entity; JENNIFER MAGUIRE, in her official capacity an City Manager of the City of San Jose; CITY OF SAN JOSE CITY

COUNCIL,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 10, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: WARDLAW, GOULD, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Howard Jarvis Taxpayer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.