Green Technology Lighting Corp. v. Crouse and Associates Insurance Services of Northern California

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202424-66California1,131 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREEN TECHNOLOGY LIGHTING No. 24-66 CORP., a Georgia corporation, D.C. No. 1:17-cv-00432-DCN Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CROUSE AND ASSOCIATES

INSURANCE SERVICES OF

NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, INC., a California corporation,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2024** San Francisco, California

Before: BYBEE, BEA, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff Green Technology Lighting Corporation (“Green Tech”) appeals the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). order of the District Court for the District of Idaho granting summary judgment in

favor of Defendant Crouse and Associates…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.