Steven Hyer v. City and County of Honolulu
118 F.4th 1044
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202423-15335California10,870 words
Opinion
Opinion
Paez, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN A. HYER, Individually and No. 23-15335 as Personal Representative of The Estate of Steven K. Hyer, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00586- Plaintiff-Appellant, HG-RT
and
OPINION
THERESA L. CHANG; CASSI H.
HYER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF
HONOLULU; PAUL V. NOBRIGA,
in his individual capacity; WAYNE SILVA, in his individual capacity; MALO B. TORRES, in his individual capacity,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
JOHN DOES, 4-10; JANE DOES, 1-
10; DOE CORPORATIONS, 1-10; DOE PARTNERSHIPS, 1-10; DOE
UNINCORPORATED
ORGANIZATIONS, 1-10,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Helen W. Gillmor, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 14, 2024 University of Hawaii Manoa
Filed September 23, 2024
Before: Richard A. Paez, Milan D. Smith, Jr., and Lucy H. Koh, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Paez
HYER V. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU
SUMMARY*
Expert Testimony / Qualified Immunity
The panel reversed in part and affirmed in part the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendants, the City and County…