Balmuccino, LLC v. Starbucks Corporation

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202423-35561California1,261 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BALMUCCINO, LLC, a California limited No. 23-35561 liability company, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01501-JHC Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

STARBUCKS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington John H. Chun, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted September 13, 2024 San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges, and R. COLLINS,** District Judge.

Plaintiff-Appellant Balmuccino, LLC, appeals the district court’s dismissal

with prejudice of its claims against Defendant-Appellee Starbucks Corporation. In

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Raner C. Collins, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. relevant part, Balmuccino’s first amended complaint alleged breach of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.