People v. Hernandez CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 2024C098627California6,373 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/23/24 P. v. Hernandez CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin) ----

THE PEOPLE, C098627

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. STK-CR-

FECOD-2020-0007801)

v.

RANGEL GUMESINDO HERNANDEZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Rangel Gumesindo Hernandez guilty of first degree murder and found true a personal use of a firearm enhancement. He was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole for murder, plus 25 years to life for the firearm enhancement. His primary argument on appeal is that it was error to permit a detective to testify about events shown on a surveillance video that captured part of the incident because that testimony invaded the province of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.